caitlin rosenthal accounting for slavery

When they showed the superintendent a better way, they gave up their own power. The relations of control could change over time: “At any time a lathe hand may be able to show the superintendent a better way.” But from the perspective of workers, fleeting reversals offered little benefit. One associate of Taylor’s, Scudder Klyce, argued that scientific management was simply a system of “Cooperation or democracy,” but Klyce’s definition of democracy was decidedly undemocratic: he describes it as a system that “consists of the able person’s taking the lead in giving ‘orders’ in the cases where he is of superior ability, and the others’ submitting: it is the relationship of master and slave, regardless of how otherwise it may be named.” From the manager’s perspective, control was the essential characteristic of scientific management.

But there is nonetheless something revealing and deeply troubling about the analogy, particularly because proponents of scientific management sometimes used the language of slavery as well-and not to condemn the system but to praise it. Of course, the ticking of a stopwatch is wildly different from the lash of the whip-or a whip and a watch used in tandem, as was the case on some plantations. This is too much for a man to stand.” The head of a machinists’ union argued that the system had “reduced the men to virtual slavery, low wages,” and that it had “engendered such an air of suspicion among the men that each man regards every other man as a possible traitor or spy.” At the close of the hearings, though the committee took little action, it agreed that elements of the system acted “the same as a slave driver’s whip on the negro, as it keeps him in a constant state of agitation.” and with a stop watch stand over you while you bend down to pick up a few rods. An experienced iron worker from the Watertown Arsenal in Massachusetts told the committee that scientific management felt to him “as if it is getting down to slavery.” Managers, he said, exerted extreme control, “following you when you are at your job.

And scientific management’s critics gestured to a very different point of reference-slavery. However, when Taylor and others were called to testify in 1911, the tone was far from inspirational. The parallels between present-day business management practices and slavery have been persistently neglected in mainstream discussions about the history of U.S.

Caitlin rosenthal accounting for slavery